Lance's Corner

AHRQ Issues Report on Adverse Childhood Experiences and Health Care Spending

Aug 20, 2024

Per the notice below, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has issued a report on the effect of adverse childhood experiences on subsequent adult health care spending.

Healthcare Spending 26 Percent Higher Among Adults Who Had Adverse Childhood Experiences

It is a tragic reality that children who endure traumatic experiences—such as household members' substance abuse or mental illness, divorced or separated parents, and physical, verbal, or sexual abuse—are more likely to struggle with severe difficulties in adulthood.  Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are strong predictors of low-income status, risky health behaviors, substance abuse, chronic physical and mental health conditions, and other adverse outcomes.  Less is known, however, about the association between ACEs and their impacts on adult healthcare utilization and expenditures.  As part of efforts to bring data to bear on critical topics impacting cost, access, and care outcomes, AHRQ has published an analysis in the most recent issue of Health Affairs that provides insights into ACEs and their relationship with healthcare utilization in adulthood.  Our team—Thomas M. Selden, Ph.D., Didem M. Bernard, Ph.D., Sandra L. Decker, Ph.D., and Zhengyi Fang, M.S.—examined AHRQ's 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)–Household Component to gain insights on this relationship.  The results were compelling:

  • Among U.S. adults, 62.6 percent reported at least one ACE.
  • Adults with ACEs have 26.3 percent higher healthcare expenditures compared to those without ACEs.  Healthcare utilization was also higher, especially for emergency department care (41 percent higher among those with ACEs).
  • Adults with ACEs have a higher prevalence of health behaviors such as smoking and excessive drinking, depression, psychological distress, and chronic conditions such as high cholesterol, high blood pressure, and heart disease.
  • In 2021, the 157.6 million U.S. adults with ACEs accounted for $292 billion in additional healthcare expenditures compared to demographically similar adults without ACEs.

Prior research has highlighted the prevalence of ACEs and their connection to subsequent health conditions and behaviors.  In contrast, few studies have examined ACEs and their impacts on healthcare utilization and expenditures, and that research has relied on small patient cohorts, evidence from other countries, evidence for a single payment source, or model-based extrapolation.  To help fill data gaps that have limited understanding of ACEs' impacts on adult healthcare utilization and expenditures, the new social determinants of health self-administered questionnaire in the 2021 MEPS included 11 questions about ACEs.  The resulting data provided the first nationally representative estimates of ACEs–related healthcare utilization and expenditure differences based on direct observation rather than model-based extrapolation.  Our analysis showed associations between ACEs and a range of adverse adult circumstances, including financial and housing problems, social network problems, little or no life satisfaction, stress, food insecurity, and exposure to verbal abuse, physical harm, and discrimination.

Additional research is needed to understand better the factors leading to ACEs, but much is already known about programs shown to reduce abuse and neglect and mitigate their long-term effects.  Policies include home visits for young children, improved childcare, peer support programs, mentoring, family strengthening efforts, family-friendly labor laws, and education campaigns on screening for and treating exposed children and adults.  Our analysis points to potential healthcare expenditure savings that might help mitigate the cost of these programs if successful.  The large differences in healthcare needs, utilization, and expenditures the authors found also highlight the importance of further research on how well the healthcare system meets the needs of those with ACEs.  Childhood trauma has lasting impacts on health and well-being.  Patients with a history of ACEs can become distressed or even re-traumatized because of their healthcare experiences.  These patients may benefit from trauma-informed care.  Yet, despite the high prevalence of ACEs, further research is needed on how best to identify patients with trauma and how to implement trauma-informed care interventions across healthcare settings to meet the unique needs of trauma survivors, reducing barriers to their care, and resulting in more equitable care.  Properly designed and implemented trauma-informed interventions promise to improve the well-being of clinicians and patients, improving the "doctor-patient" relationship.  By fostering trauma history screenings during intake, symptoms can be viewed as normal reactions to trauma rather than other pathologies, reducing "diagnostic error."  This could enhance the patient's and caregivers' sense of safety and respect.  These kinds of care delivery challenges are precisely the areas in which AHRQ-funded research seeks to provide evidence.

AHRQ's new study quantifies the extent to which ACEs are associated with high societal costs in the form of increased healthcare spending.  More broadly, it aligns with efforts by AHRQ and the Biden-Harris administration to emphasize that improving behavioral health is critical to the Nation’s prosperity and advancing person-centered care.  The results of this analysis and others like it add to the existing evidence that targeting ACEs' enormous societal costs raises the potential for essential returns on investment in policies and interventions that address these issues.  Further, they provide an urgent signal for improving the quality of healthcare and social services for those with ACEs by transforming our care delivery systems to be more person-centered.

USDOL Issues Comprehensive Employer Guidance on Long COVID

The United States Department of Labor (USDOL) has issued a comprehensive set of resources that can be accessed below for employers on dealing with Long COVID.

Supporting Employees with Long COVID: A Guide for Employers

The “Supporting Employees with Long COVID” guide from the USDOL-funded Employer Assistance and Resource Network on Disability Inclusion (EARN) and Job Accommodation Network (JAN) addresses the basics of Long COVID, including its intersection with mental health, and common workplace supports for different symptoms.  It also explores employers’ responsibilities to provide reasonable accommodations and answers frequently asked questions about Long COVID and employment, including inquiries related to telework and leave.

Download the guide

Accommodation and Compliance: Long COVID

The Long COVID Accommodation and Compliance webpage from the USDOL-funded Job Accommodation Network (JAN) helps employers and employees understand strategies for supporting workers with Long COVID.  Topics include Long COVID in the context of disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), specific accommodation ideas based on limitations or work-related functions, common situations and solutions, and questions to consider when identifying effective accommodations for employees with Long COVID.  Find this and other Long COVID resources from JAN, below:

Long COVID, Disability and Underserved Communities: Recommendations for Employers

The research-to-practice brief “Long COVID, Disability and Underserved Communities” synthesizes an extensive review of documents, literature and data sources, conducted by the USDOL-funded Employer Assistance and Resource Network on Disability Inclusion (EARN) on the impact of Long COVID on employment, with a focus on demographic differences.  It also outlines recommended actions organizations can take to create a supportive and inclusive workplace culture for people with Long COVID, especially those with disabilities who belong to other historically underserved groups.

Read the brief

Long COVID and Disability Accommodations in the Workplace

The policy brief “Long COVID and Disability Accommodations in the Workplace” explores Long COVID’s impact on the workforce and provides examples of policy actions different states are taking to help affected people remain at work or return when ready.  It was developed by the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) as part of its involvement in USDOL’s State Exchange on Employment and Disability (SEED) initiative.

Download the policy brief

Understanding and Addressing the Workplace Challenges Related to Long COVID

The report “Understanding and Addressing the Workplace Challenges Related to Long COVID” summarizes key themes and takeaways from an ePolicyWorks national online dialogue through which members of the public were invited to share their experiences and insights regarding workplace challenges posed by Long COVID.  The dialogue took place during summer 2022 and was hosted by USDOL and its agencies in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Surgeon General.

Download the report

Working with Long COVID

The USDOL-published “Working with Long COVID” fact sheet shares strategies for supporting workers with Long COVID, including accommodations for common symptoms and resources for further guidance and assistance with specific situations.

Download the fact sheet

COVID-19: Long-Term Symptoms

This USDOL motion graphic informs workers with Long COVID that they may be entitled to temporary or long-term supports to help them stay on the job or return to work when ready, and shares where they can find related assistance.

Watch the motion graphic

A Personal Story of Long COVID and Disability Disclosure

In the podcast “A Personal Story of Long COVID and Disability Disclosure,” Pam Bingham, senior program manager for Intuit’s Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in Tech team, shares her personal experience of navigating Long COVID symptoms at work.  The segment was produced by the USDOL-funded Partnership on Employment and Accessible Technology (PEAT) as part of its ongoing “Future of Work” podcast series.

Listen to the podcast

HHS OIG Issues Annual Report on State MFCUs

Per the notice below, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has issued its annual report on the performance of state Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MFCUs).

Medicaid Fraud Control Units Fiscal Year 2023 Annual Report (OEI-09-24-00200) 

Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MFCUs) investigate and prosecute Medicaid provider fraud and patient abuse or neglect. OIG is the Federal agency that oversees and annually approves federal funding for MFCUs through a recertification process. This new report analyzed the statistical data on annual case outcomes—such as convictions, civil settlements and judgments, and recoveries—that the 53 MFCUs submitted for Fiscal Year 2023.  New York data is as follows:

Outcomes

  • Investigations1 - 556
  • Indicted/Charged - 9
  • Convictions - 8
  • Civil Settlements/Judgments - 28
  • Recoveries2 - $73,204,518

Resources

  • MFCU Expenditures3 - $55,964,293
  • Staff on Board4 - 257

1Investigations are defined as the total number of open investigations at the end of the fiscal year.

2Recoveries are defined as the amount of money that defendants are required to pay as a result of a settlement, judgment, or prefiling settlement in criminal and civil cases and may not reflect actual collections.  Recoveries may involve cases that include participation by other Federal and State agencies.

3MFCU and Medicaid Expenditures include both State and Federal expenditures.

4Staff on Board is defined as the total number of staff employed by the Unit at the end of the fiscal year.

Read the Full Report

View the Statistical Chart

Engage with the Interactive Map

GAO Issues Report on Medicaid Managed Care Service Denials and Appeal Outcomes

The United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) has issued a report on federal use of state data on Medicaid managed care service denials and appeal outcomes.  GAO found that federal oversight is limited because it doesn't require states to report on Medicaid managed care service denials or appeal outcomes and there has not been much progress on plans to analyze and make the data publicly available.  To read the GAO report on federal use of state data on Medicaid managed care service denials and appeal outcomes, use the first link below.  To read GAO highlights of the report on federal use of state data on Medicaid managed care service denials and appeal outcomes, use the second link below.
https://www.gao.gov/assets/d24106627.pdf  (GAO report on federal use of state data on Medicaid managed care service denials and appeal outcomes)
https://www.gao.gov/assets/d24106627_high.pdf  (GAO highlights on federal use of state data on Medicaid managed care service denials and appeal outcomes)

CMS Issues Latest Medicare Regulatory Activities Update

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has issued its latest update on its regulatory activities in the Medicare program.  While dentistry is only minimally connected to the Medicare program, Medicare drives the majority of health care policies and insurance reimbursement policies throughout the country.  Therefore, it always pays to keep a close eye on what CMS is doing in Medicare.  To read the latest CMS update on its regulatory activities in Medicare, use the link below.
https://www.cms.gov/training-education/medicare-learning-network/newsletter/2024-03-14-mlnc